EXPERIENCE MATTERS...
LET US PROVE IT TO YOU.

view our case results read client reviews

Personal Injury Blog

Can a Jaywalking Pedestrian Seek Compensation For an Accident?

Friday, February 15, 2019

If you live in California, you likely seek more than one jaywalker every day whether you are walking or driving. Chances are, if you are walking somewhere, you might be the one jaywalking because literally, everyone else seems to do it. If the roads seem clear, then making the extra effort to walk to the nearest crosswalk seems like a waste of effort and time when you can just cross right there. Unfortunately, there are laws against jaywalking specifically because of how unsafe it is for pedestrians. Yet, the question remains, if a pedestrian is struck by a driver while they are jaywalking, can they still get compensation for the accident?

The short and easy answer? Like usual, it is a maybe.

Duty of Care Required By Drivers and Pedestrians

By California law, both driver and pedestrian are required to exercise a certain duty of care that can be at play in these cases. Drivers are required to yield to the right of way of pedestrians at both marked and unmarked crosswalks at intersections. They are expected to reduce speed when approaching an intersection with potential pedestrians and take caution for any crossings. Unfortunately, there are times when the driver can't spot a pedestrian, and this becomes more likely when a pedestrian is jaywalking.

Similarly, the pedestrian is expected to take the same duty of care by not leaving the curb and walking into oncoming traffic. Doing so not only puts their safety at risk but the safety of the driver as well. Having to make an unexpected stop even at a crosswalk is dangerous when driving with even light other traffic as the driver can cause other auto accidents trying to avoid the pedestrian.

In truth, this duty of care still extends to jaywalking by both parties. However, as the pedestrian was jaywalking, it often limits their ability to get compensation for the accident. Though, the pedestrian is not without options. If the driver was also behaving badly, compensation can still be recovered.

Jaywalking pedestrians can still recover compensation if the driver was:

  • Speeding

  • Intoxicated

  • Distracted Driving

Unfortunately, all of the above can occasionally be difficult to prove without the help of a skilled lawyer.

California Comparative Negligence

As a comparative negligence state, the portion that the jaywalking pedestrian can be placed at fault will be deducted from the compensation they can receive. For example, if a pedestrian who was jaywalking was deemed to be about 50 percent at fault for an accident with a driver that was speeding, they can only recover 50 percent of the damages awarded by the court.

This does mean that even if you were jaywalking, you can still recover some compensation if you were hit by a motorist. However, it also means that you might not recover all the compensation that you need to cover your medical bills. For this reason, it is really best if you just make the effort to walk to the nearest crossing. Being hit by a car is pretty traumatic, but if you have to be hit by a car, you should at least be able to recover full compensation for it because you were both following the law and exercising your duty of care as a pedestrian.

Need Help?

Were you one of California's many jaywalking pedestrians that just, unfortunately, happened to be struck by a car? As you were doing something illegal, you may think your options for recovering compensation simply don't exist. However, that isn't true at all. Contact us today so we can look over your case. Come see how the Law Office of Freeman & Freeman can help you get the compensation that you deserve from a traumatic pedestrian accident.

Burns as the Result of a Poorly Trained Stylist

Thursday, January 10, 2019

Burns as the Result of a Poorly Trained Stylist

Every day thousands of people put their hair and more in the hands of a professional hair stylist so they can look good. Whether it is just a quick wash and set or a speedy waxing, things can go wrong, and if they do, it can leave very visible injuries. While most hair stylists attend cosmetology school, this is roughly just a few months of lessons. For some, they may not graduate with all they need to provide you a safe experience at the salon. Unfortunately, the hair salon can be a dangerous place when you are in the hands of an inexperienced stylist, but they can be held liable for these serious injuries.

Injuries From Hair Salon Negligence

With luck, you will never need to know all the many ways you can get hurt at the salon. However, with an inexperienced stylist or even a salon that doesn't give proper care, you very, unfortunately, could find out. Salon injuries include:

  • Curling iron burns to the scalp or skin
  • Burns from the hair dryers
  • Burns from hot wax heated beyond recommendations
  • Chemical burns from dyes and other products
  • Slips on wet or debris-covered floors

To many, the worst thing that can come out of the salon is a bad haircut or a terrible dye job, but all of the above can have a much more lasting effect. However, the good news is that if you were hurt at the salon due to the negligence of another, you have the right to compensation through a personal injury suit.

Proving Hair Salon Negligence

Hair salon cases can be difficult. Often if it is just a small burn on the scalp, many personal injury lawyers will let you know that your case isn't really worth it. However, many injuries can be very visible and may even need surgical intervention to rectify. For these cases, typically they will be stronger not only because you have very visible injuries, but because it will likely be easier to prove a breach in duty of care.

For a successful personal injury case against a salon, which will generally cover the liability of their workers, you need to prove that the employee in question failed to follow directions or the reasonable safety standards of their peers. This can come in many forms, including witness statements from the time of the accident or security camera footage. One of the most crucial pieces of evidence to your case, however, is pictures of the injuries. The thing about injuries is that they tend to heal, so courts will not get an accurate picture of how badly you were hurt unless you document those injuries soon after they happen. Evidence for every incident is different, and thus it is best to consult with your lawyer after seeking medical treatment.

Once treated and making the decision to pursue a personal injury case, it is important to keep documentation of all medical treatment. Personal injury cases are designed to cover your medical bills, but if you don't have records of all these treatments, it can be more difficult to get accurate compensation. After being injured at a salon, you can also receive compensation for future medical expenses, pain and suffering, as well as a loss of income while you recovered from the injury.

Need Help?

Have you been injured by a hair salon or other spa-type business? Whether you were hurt due to an inexperienced employee or by malfunctioning equipment, we can help you. For those in the Los Angeles area, contact us today to see what the Law Office of Freeman & Freeman can do for you.

You Have a Strong Case, But A Lawyer Won't Take It

Thursday, January 03, 2019

You don't have to be educated in the law to know what makes a strong accident case. If you were in an accident that was not your fault with your vehicle totaled, it looks like you have a pretty solid case. However, when you take it to a personal injury attorney to get your injuries and other damages covered, they turn you down. For most lawyers, they will explain why they won't take your case. However, sometimes that answer isn't really enough to satisfy you. 

So why isn't a personal injury lawyer taking your case?

In some instances, a law firm may simply be too busy to take your case. In fact, if you don't get a yes, this is the answer you want. No one wants a law firm that is technically too busy to try and take their case. It won't get the attention that it deserves.

However, aside from that very reasonable excuse not to take on your case, the main reason is that your case isn't as strong as you think it is. Even if you know that it is not your fault, legal cases are all about being able to prove it. The biggest reason that a law firm won't take your case is that they don't think they can prove it, or it would be too much of a challenge to do so.

The law firm would be responsible for presenting evidence that supports the fact that the accident was both not your fault and caused your injuries. For most accident cases, this isn't as hard. They will gather witness statements, examine police reports, and often evidence can be gathered from simply examining the scene of the crime.

Another big issue comes with proving how much you were hurt. If you were in an accident other than an auto accident, compensation comes from covering your injuries. However, they will need to prove the extent of those injuries. This is where problems can come from. Certain injuries, such as spine or head injuries, can be very tricky to prove. Furthermore, they can be worse than anyone imagines, so it is difficult to prove and get adequate compensation for them.

What does all this have to do with a lawyer not wanting your case? 

 The reason is simple: they don't want to lose. Some lawyers get paid only if they win, so if they don't win then that case has been nothing but a waste of time. Even if a lawyer does get paid for their time even if they lose, fighting a case that is extremely difficult may not be worth their time either. It means they have less time for other cases and it is a detriment to their firm.

If you have had your case denied by a law firm, it is not the end of the world. However, if you have had your case denied by several law firms, there is usually a reason for it. It is too difficult to prove and too difficult to win. However, in these cases, it may be tempting to give up. Yet, for those in an accident, giving up on their case may not be an option. You need that compensation for expensive medical bills and you need a lawyer that will help you fight for it.

If you have been in an accident in the greater Los Angeles area and need a lawyer that is willing to fight for your case, contact us today. The Law Office of Freeman & Freeman is ready to help you go over your case as well as to point out any specific problem areas that may occur.


Bus Injuries As a Result From Sudden Acceleration

Thursday, December 13, 2018

Not all injuries on a bus occur from a random accident. In fact, bus travel is a relatively safe form of travel where accidents are either fairly minor to those inside or very rare altogether. However, an accident is not the only way to get hurt on a bus. Often the biggest cause of bus-related accidents comes in the form of accidents between the passenger and just riding on the bus. One of the most common includes accidents from rapid acceleration by the bus driver.

Rapid Acceleration: Driver or Passenger Fault?

For those who ride on the bus every day, they might not be altogether unfamiliar with the rapid acceleration of the bus by its driver. You get on the bus and while looking for a seat, the bus suddenly jolts forward as the driver eagerly pushes towards their next stop. Bus drivers are trained so that this acceleration should be rather gentle, but they still should wait until all passengers are safely sat down before moving.

So if this rapid acceleration did occur, whose fault is it? It seems fairly straightforward that it would be the driver's fault for not waiting for all passengers to be secure, but that is not always the case. The driver can't always control the passengers or other outside factors on the road. If they need to accelerate to change lanes or avoid hazards, they need to do so. If this time coincides with a passenger fooling around and not sitting safely, then the fault doesn't actually lie with the driver, but with the passenger.

However, while a bus may be full of many witnesses, usually it is not the witness testimony that is relied upon to prove fault. Instead, many buses come with surveillance that helps determine the liability in the accident. If passenger surveillance determines that the passenger was misbehaving in an unsafe manner, they may be barred from compensation from the accident.

Types of Injuries That Can Occur From Sudden Acceleration

When it comes to the rapid or sudden acceleration of a bus, the most common type of accident is a fall. This can manifest a number of serious injuries. However, while a fall on a public bus may be embarrassing, it is important to remember that you must have sustained sufficient harm in order to pursue a lawsuit. A scrape or a scratch, in most cases, it is not enough to pursue what will be an expensive lawsuit.

In bus accidents, it is usually only worth pursuing a lawsuit if your injuries forced you to go to the hospital. The sudden acceleration could be breaking your arm after a fall or serious head trauma after hitting something on the bus like the edge of a seat. Both these injuries, and many others, will likely result in your hospitalization after the accident. If you have medical bills that resulted from an accident, this is always a case for litigation. However, you will find that if you only suffered minor injuries, a lawsuit seeking punitive compensation will likely be unsuccessful even if the driver is completely at fault. The world looks down on frivolous lawsuits that are solely meant to punish, and they have a much higher chance of being unsuccessful these days.

Need Help?

For most, the only bus accident they fear is a serious auto accident that will be blamed on traffic. However, injuries can happen on a bus without an actual crash. If you have been the victim of a sudden acceleration bus injury, and need help getting compensation to cover your medical bills, contact us today. Let the Freeman & Freeman Law Firm come to your aid.

Can an Animal Rescue Be Liable For a Dog Bite?

Thursday, November 15, 2018

When it comes to the city or state-run animal control, their business is to take dangerous animals off the street to prevent various issues, namely animal attacks. However, you also have groups working independently of the government to re-home dogs and other animals found on the street or in neglectful situations. These groups have the benefit of being able to place dogs and other animals with loving homes and also removing them from shelters in which, if not adopted in a certain amount of time, they will be euthanized.

Dog Bites

Unfortunately, while dangerous animals can be rehabilitated in many cases, it takes time to do so. During this time, there is the potential that they could lash out violently and hurt someone. If you were the victim of a dog bite by an animal that was under the care of an animal rescue group, can you hold those groups liable for the attack?

The answer, in most cases, is yes. As there is always the potential for any dog to bite someone this means that rescue groups need to take the time to protect themselves from what could very well be not a possibility, but an eventuality. In the larger animal rescue group, you will find that they have insurance to protect the group in case of an animal bite. If a dog bites someone, whether it is a worker or someone looking to adopt a dog, the insurance will be there to pay for the medical bills of the victim. However, if you are dealing with smaller animal rescue groups, they may not have the insurance, but you still retain the right to file a personal injury lawsuit.

Who's Liable?

While you maintain the right to pursue a personal injury suit against an animal rescue group, you must also realize the certain reality of doing so. Animal rescues, particularly small ones, run on a limited budget. Typically, this is the reason they did not have insurance in the first place. Often one bite and the impending lawsuit will unravel the organization. For some, they may choose not to pursue a lawsuit because it would likely mean the end of that particular rescue. However, dog bites can be more than just simply bites. They can be vicious attacks that require extended medical treatment, even plastic surgery to rectify. In these cases, there is no question who should come first – the victim.

Personal Injury

A personal injury suit against a group is much like a personal injury suit against an individual. You must first prove that the organization was liable for the injury. If the animal had attacked you on the animal rescue's property, they had the responsibility for making sure it was secured. However, it needs to be proved that you did not actively provoke the animal either. As they were harboring the animal, the organization has the responsibility to actively work to prevent attacks.

As for who to file the personal injury lawsuit against, you may not be filing it against the animal rescue group as a whole. Often these groups work on donations and have very little if any, profits from it. Instead of filing against the group as a whole, it is likely you will be filing the personal injury lawsuit against the person in charge of the group such as a leader or a founder. This is generally why many animal rescue groups insist they have insurance because a personal injury lawsuit against an individual is damaging financially.

If you have been bitten by a dog, whether it was held by an animal rescue group or just a private owner, contact us today. The Law Office of Freeman & Freeman can help get you the compensation you deserve for your injury.


CATEGORIES

Submit

Office Locations

21900 Burbank Boulevard
Third Floor
Woodland Hills, CA 91367-7418

P: 818-992-2919
F: 818-992-2940


From our offices in Woodland Hills, California, Freeman & Freeman, LLP, provides legal advice and representation for clients in communities throughout the state, including those in Burbank, Glendale, Encino, Sherman Oaks, Van Nuys, Tarzana, Santa Clarita, Agoura Hills, Reseda, Canoga Park, Chatsworth, Northridge, Granada Hills, Pacoima, Panorama City, North Hollywood, Thousand Oaks, Simi Valley, Lancaster, Palmdale and Alhambra.